Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41704505›Full record

ArticleData in brief2026

The DISCOURSE in psychosis (London Ontario): A speech dataset to examine communication disturbances in early-stage psychosis.

Brian Cho, Estée Balles, Michael Mackinley, Paulina Dzialoszynski, Sabrina Ford, Rohit Lodhi, Lena Palaniyappan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Data in brief, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Brian ChoSchulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Estée BallesSchulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Michael MackinleyRobarts Research Institute, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Paulina DzialoszynskiRobarts Research Institute, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Sabrina FordRobarts Research Institute, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Rohit LodhiDepartment of Psychiatry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Lena PalaniyappanRobarts Research Institute, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in speech technology and Natural Language Processing (NLP) have demonstrated promise in using speech as a valid source of data to detect features of psychosis. These technologies can potentially detect subtle speech aberrations that often go unnoticed by clinicians and family members. However, research in this area is hindered by a significant limitation: a lack of sufficient and appropriate speech corpora from psychosis patients, especially datasets containing naturalistic speech that reflects typical clinical interactions. This scarcity limits the development, testing, and generalization of new computational methods for psychosis prediction. To address this gap, our new dataset offers naturalistic speech samples collected using the semi-structured DISCOURSE protocol. This resource includes both raw audio recordings and transcribed speech from individuals participating in an early-stage psychosis treatment program (<5 years of illness), alongside demographically matched healthy controls, in English. In addition to speech data, the dataset provides comprehensive clinical, cognitive, and demographic information for each participant. Importantly, the DISCOURSE protocol and clinical assessments were repeated after a 12-month follow-up to assess stability and change in speech, symptom burden and functional status. As the inaugural dataset released by the DISCOURSE consortium, this resource marks the beginning of a series of harmonized data collection efforts across multiple countries and languages. This multi-site, multi-language approach enables validation of findings in diverse psychosis populations, allowing researchers to address questions that cannot be resolved at individual research sites. Transcripts were extracted from conversations lasting between 15 and 35 minutes in total. This data herein can be used to perform analyses on acoustic, semantic, syntactic and pragmatic measures related to psychosis, as well as in understanding the nature of communication difficulties faced by patients. We expect this dataset to be useful for future investigations into speech data's clinical utility in assessing thought disorder and psychosis-related symptoms.

Indexed as

Digital healthLanguage modelsNatural language processingSchizophreniaVoice

Identifiers

PMID41704505
PMCPMC12907862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.