ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Case Report: Primary cutaneous apocrine carcinoma mimicking breast carcinoma - a rare diagnostic challenge.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: A 60-year-old male patient presented to a senological clinic with a left axillary tumor. The histomorphological characteristics were ambiguous, initially pointing to apocrine carcinoma of mammary origin. This suspicion led to a delay in establishing the correct diagnosis. Only after complete tumor excision and comprehensive work-up in a multidisciplinary dermato-oncological clinic could a definitive diagnosis of primary cutaneous apocrine carcinoma (PCAC) be reached, allowing for appropriate therapy to be commenced. Case Presentation: The patient had an unremarkable medical history and had presented for excisional biopsy of an axillary nodule. Following the cancer diagnosis, several diagnostic tests and histopathological evaluations were initially performed in a senological setting to assess the likelihood of (metastatic) mammary carcinoma. Workup included breast ultrasonography, CT and MRI imaging and bone scintigraphy. A previously unrecognized subcutaneous tumor mass was identified in the left axilla, located deep to the excised nodule. No further lesions, either mammary or otherwise, were detected. The patient was referred to a dermato-oncological clinic, and the subcutaneous mass, containing metastatic lymph nodes, was completely excised with clear margins. Following extensive histopathological analysis, imaging and deliberation in the interdisciplinary tumor board, mammary carcinoma and metastatic disease were ruled out and the diagnosis of primary cutaneous apocrine carcinoma was reached. Adjuvant locoregional radiotherapy could subsequently proceed. Conclusion: This case underscores the importance of an interdisciplinary approach in diagnosing axillary neoplasms and illustrates the valuable role of a high-volume, multidisciplinary skin cancer center in optimizing patient management. Although patients may initially present to a senological clinic, maintaining a broad differential diagnosis is crucial, especially when treating tumors with overlapping or atypical features. This prevents misdiagnoses, ensuring timely and effective care, thereby improving patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.