ReviewJournal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures)2026
Evidence-based fluid resuscitation of the septic HFpEF patient: A narrative review of the literature.
Review in Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Coronary microvascular dysfunction in HFpEF: pathophysiologic mechanisms, diagnosis, treatments, and the amplifying potential of sepsis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This narrative review aims to highlight the available evidence on fluid resuscitation in septic patients with heart failure, with a particular focus on heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Methods: A PubMed search was conducted using the keywords "sepsis" (or sepsis, or septic shock), "heart failure" (or HF, or HFrEF, or HFpEF or congestive heart failure), and "fluid" (or resuscitation, or fluid resuscitation, or fluid management). The results were summarized in narrative review format. Results/Conclusions: The presence of HFpEF in septic patients appears to be associated with an increased risk of adverse outcomes. This population may benefit from a more individualized approach to fluid resuscitation. Emerging tools for assessing fluid responsiveness and characterizing septic cardiovascular physiology show promise, but further investigation is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.