Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41704311›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2026

Processing difficulties and biochemical barriers in camel milk fermentation.

Sifatun Nesa Ali, Mutamed Ayyash, Afaf Kamal-Eldin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sifatun Nesa AliDepartment of Food Science, College of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.
Mutamed AyyashDepartment of Food Science, College of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.
Afaf Kamal-EldinDepartment of Food Science, College of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Camel milk (CM) is recognized for its high nutritional enrichment, and the distinction from bovine milk mainly because of its unique protein composition, proteolytic products, and anti-microbial compounds. These unique chemical properties have positive effects on the nutritional value but negative impact on the sensory attributes and consumer acceptability of fermented CM. This review summarizes the current state of knowledge on CM fermentation, emphasizing the influence of milk composition on gel and microstructure formation, texture, and overall quality of the products. While the richness of fermented CM in bioactive peptides enhances its nutritional and therapeutic values, major challenges are associated with their thin consistency and weak gel structure. Various strategies to overcome these challenges and develop unique functional fermented CM products are discussed, including the use of alternative starter cultures (e.g.,

Indexed as

bovine milk yogurtcamel milk yogurtfermentationmicrostructurestarter culturestexture

Identifiers

PMID41704311
PMCPMC12907412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.