ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2025
A computational approach for intramural length estimation in anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Accuracy of CT-derived interarterial and intramural anomalous coronary arteries anatomy compared with 3D-reconstructed IVUS in-vivo reference.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery (AAOCA) is associated with sudden cardiac death. The intramural (IM) length is considered high-risk, yet radiologic measurements by computed tomography angiography (CTA) show variable agreement with measurements at surgery. We aimed to develop a semi-automatic computational method to estimate IM length in a retrospective cohort of surgical AAOCA patients. Methods: In 58 patients [49 right(R), 9 left(L)], CTA images were used to generate 3D segmentations of the aorta and a centerline of the anomalous coronary. The distance from the centerline to the aortic segmentation was calculated. The IM length was estimated from a transition point in the derivative of the distance curve and compared to radiologic and surgical measurements. Results: Our method demonstrated an overall root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 3.4 mm, comparable to radiologic estimates (3.2 mm). For L-AAOCA subjects, our method showed lower root-mean-square error compared to radiologic estimates (our method: 3.6 mm, radiologic: 4.7 mm). For R-AAOCA subjects, the RMSE was higher in our method compared to radiologic estimates (our method: 3.4 mm, radiologic: 2.8 mm). Conclusion: This is a pilot study of a computational approach to measure intramural length that is shown to be accurate relative to surgical measurements. Computational methods that represent and quantify morphology, including acute take-off angle, ostial characteristics, minimal luminal area, and intramural length, may be helpful for risk stratification and surgical planning in AAOCA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.