ArticleInnovative surgical sciences2026
Strategies for surgical reconstruction of complex elbow deformities based on patient-specific instruments - a case series and narrative review.
Article in Innovative surgical sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Autologous protein solution and 3D-Printed technologies as potential adjuncts to arthroscopic elbow release: a narrative review and conceptual framework.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The application of 3D-based methods for deformity correction of the upper extremity, including patient-specific instruments (PSIs), is attracting increasing attention in clinical practice and requires the collaboration of orthopaedic surgeons and medical engineers. Methods: The management of various elbow deformities using 3D-based surgical methods, including PSIs, is presented. A narrative literature review with a defined search strategy using PubMed as a database was conducted to identify further applications around the elbow that have been published to date. Results: This case series presents with one case each the correction of the following deformities: cubitus varus, dorsal radial head subluxation, translational deformity of the distal humerus, cubitus valgus (CVL) and radial head dislocation in hereditary multiple exostoses (HME). The Supplementary literature with 28 studies presents further deformities that were corrected on a 3D basis: intra-articular fracture of the capitulum radii, extension deformity of the distal humerus and malunited radial neck fractures. These 3D-based procedures have been used most frequently to correct cubitus varus and are superior to conventional methods in terms of accuracy in comparative studies. Conclusions: The application of 3D-based planning methods, including PSIs use, offers excellent opportunities and accuracy for corrective osteotomies around the elbow. In addition to the correction of cubitus varus, extension to the correction of chronic dislocation of the radial head after Monteggia fracture and HME appears promising. The future implementation of 3D-based planning based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) would be highly desirable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.