Observational studyPeerJ2026
Inclined treadmill walking kinetics of the non-paretic leg in early post-stroke survivors: an observational case-control study.
Observational study in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Stroke remains the primary source of prolonged disability worldwide since it often results in gait asymmetry. Research shows compensatory mechanisms in chronic stroke patients' non-paretic legs but lacks knowledge about these adaptations during the early post-stroke period when walking on inclines which mimic real-world mobility challenges. Objective: This study sought to clarify the compensatory strategies in the non-paretic leg of early post-stroke survivors by analyzing the changes in vertical ground reaction force (GRF) profiles and respective variabilities during level (0%) and inclined (6%) treadmill walking, relative to healthy, matched controls. Methods: The study included fourteen early post-stroke survivors who were three months post-event or less along with fourteen matched controls. Participants walked at their preferred speeds on treadmill at 0% and 6% grade incline settings. Researchers determined key vertical GRF profiles, including peak amplitudes (F1, F2, F3), impulses (J1-J4), timing to each peak, loading/unloading rates, and their respectively variabilities. Mixed two-way repeated measures Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) were used and preferred walking speed was used as a covariate. Results: Stroke survivors demonstrated significantly slower walking speeds compared to control participants (0.6 km/hr Conclusions: The study demonstrates that treating the non-paretic leg as a healthy limb is inadequate and shows the necessity for rehabilitation approaches that target both legs individually. Focusing on motor control and force steadiness instead of simply strength can more effectively reduce maladaptive variability and enhance safe and efficient walking patterns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.