ArticleJournal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc2026
Perianesthetic death in dogs and cats: a scoping review.
Article in Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Perianesthetic death (PAD) is an uncommon yet devastating outcome in veterinary medicine, with incidence rates consistently higher than those reported in human anesthesia. In our scoping review, we summarize the current literature on PAD in dogs and cats and discuss definitions, risk factors, species-specific challenges, and the role of postmortem examinations. Although advances in veterinary anesthesia have occurred, inconsistencies in PAD definitions and follow-up periods have limited the ability to compare PAD incidence over time. Risk factors consistently associated with PAD include high American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification, age and weight extremes, species-specific traits, and procedural urgency. PAD risk is consistently higher in cats than dogs. Most studies rely on identifying clinical risk factors, with limited use of postmortem examination. When autopsies are used, they can reveal undiagnosed lesions that may have contributed to the animal's death. However, many PAD autopsy cases yield no identifiable lesions, complicating determination of cause of death. Additionally, the lack of standardized submission forms and autopsy protocols further hampers consistency in case evaluation. We highlight the need for a multidisciplinary, standardized approach to the investigation of PAD cases. Future prospective studies should incorporate structured autopsy protocols and anesthesiologist reviews to improve diagnostic yield, with the goal of improving patient safety in veterinary anesthesia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.