ArticleActa dermato-venereologica2026
The Validity and Reliability of Patient-provided Photographs for Diagnosing and Assessing the Severity of Hand Eczema.
Article in Acta dermato-venereologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hand eczema (HE) is a common skin disease, diagnosed through clinical evaluation. However, the increasing need to deliver healthcare remotely, along with the demand for valid and reliable evaluations of HE in research, prompts exploration of the potential benefits of remote assessment. This study assessed the criterion validity and inter- and intra-rater reliability of patient-provided photographs to diagnose and assess the severity of HE. The presence and severity of HE were assessed by 1 of the 2 clinical raters. Following instructions, patients took 4 photographs of their hands. All photographs were assessed twice by the clinical raters and 2 additional raters. In total, 98 patients were included. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value were respectively 85.1%, 79.2%, 92.6%, and 63.3%. Kappa values of 0.35 and 0.66 were found for inter- and intra-rater reliability. The intraclass correlation coefficients based on the Hand Eczema Severity Index (HECSI) were > 0.90. Kappa values for the criterion validity and inter- and intra-rater reliability using the photographic guide were respectively 0.71, 0.58-0.77, and 0.77. The findings indicate that patient-provided photographs are valid and reliable for remote assessment of HE and could be of benefit in healthcare and research by reducing in-person visits and enabling continuous monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.