ArticleFuture oncology (London, England)2026
Validation of a blood-based autoantibody test to assess lung cancer risk in 4-30 mm pulmonary nodules: a retrospective pooled analysis of four cohort studies.
Article in Future oncology (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sputum Liquid Biopsy for Lung Cancer Screening, Diagnosis, Subtyping, Surveillance, Response Prediction, and Prognostication: A Scoping Review.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo validate a blood-based autoantibody test (AAT) as a high specificity, rule-in biomarker for 4-30 mm indeterminate pulmonary nodules (IPN) across malignancy risk.
methodsRetrospective pooled analysis of four cohorts including adults with a 4-30 mm IPN, AAT result, and benign or malignant diagnosis. AAT results were classified as Moderate Level (all patients with elevated autoantibodies), High Level (stricter subset within Moderate Level), or No Significant Level of Autoantibodies Detected (NSLAD). Post-test probability of cancer (pCA) was calculated by applying AAT likelihood ratios to pretest pCA. Performance was assessed overall, by nodule size, and risk strata.
resultsAmong 1164 patients (35% cancer prevalence), Moderate Level results showed sensitivity 16%, specificity 91%, and PPV 50%. A stricter subset of positives at the High Level, specificity 96%, and PPV 57%, with sensitivity 9%. When post-test pCA exceeded 65%, specificity was 97% and PPV 69%, while sensitivity was 12%. Performance was consistent across cohorts, nodule sizes, and risk strata, indicating size- and risk-independent discrimination. ~10% of intermediate-risk cancers (pretest 5-65%) were reclassified above the 65% threshold, creating a group with enriched malignancy risk.
conclusionsAAT provides size- and risk-independent, high-specificity rule-in performance, identifying subsets of patients whose malignancy risk may justify expedited evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.