ArticleBMC medical education2026
Exploring perceptions of dental students, house officers, and general surgery faculty on the general surgery curriculum in the undergraduate dental program - a qualitative study.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDental education integrates foundational medical sciences, including anatomy, physiology, pathology, pharmacology, internal medicine, and general surgery, to ensure holistic patient care. In Pakistan, there are growing concerns that the current dental curriculum does not adequately address the clinical and surgical components essential for preparing students to manage cases requiring basic surgical knowledge.
objectivesTo explore the perspectives of dental students, house officers, and general surgery faculty on the relevance and effectiveness of general surgery in undergraduate dental curricula, and to identify challenges affecting clinical preparedness. STUDY
designA Qualitative Study. PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY: The study was carried out at two prominent tertiary healthcare facilities in Karachi, Pakistan. One of the participating institutions was a private-sector tertiary training institute. - Ziauddin University (ZU), while the other was affiliated with the public sector, Dow University of Health Sciences (DUHS).
methodThis study employed a purposive sampling strategy, a non-probability sampling technique that ensured participants’ some characteristics were directly relevant to the research objectives. In- depth interviews and focus group discussions were held. The thematic analysis was carried out using a hybrid approach, where deductive coding was performed based on the predetermined themes, with the inductive approach to thematic construction to draw out the core ideas.
resultParticipants had different opinions: some people suggested that general surgery topics be modified to match the specific needs of dentistry, while others defended their value in emergency care and practice of maxillofacial surgery. Concerns shown by participants included an overstuffed curriculum, inadequate practical exposure, poor supervision, and a gap between the surgery teaching and the dental practice. Faculty stressed the need for interactive teaching, while students called for early exposure to real patients, coupled with a properly organized system of clerkships.
conclusionReforming the curriculum is essential for reducing the volume of surgical content, incorporating more interactive activities, increasing the opportunities for practical training, and implementing competency-based evaluations. These steps would improve the focus of learners, increase their clinical readiness, and improve the quality of care for patients. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.