Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41703573›Full record

ArticleFluids and barriers of the CNS2026

Sensitivity of physiotherapy-based clinical tests in detecting change in gait and balance performance following a 50 mL CSF tap test in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus.

Kardelen Akar, Lena Kollén, Mats Tullberg, Hanna C Persson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Fluids and barriers of the CNS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kardelen AkarHydrocephalus Research Unit, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9945-9844
Lena KollénHydrocephalus Research Unit, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6690-6548
Mats TullbergHydrocephalus Research Unit, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4997-5266
Hanna C PerssonHydrocephalus Research Unit, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden. hanna.persson@neuro.gu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8633-3292

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCerebrospinal fluid tap test (CSF TT) is a key predictive method commonly used to identify candidates for shunt surgery in idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus (iNPH), however, the sensitivity of this procedure is limited. The aim was to compare sensitivity of a broad set of physiotherapy-based clinical tests for assessing changes following CSF TT in a group of selected iNPH patients and to explore potential sex-based differences in the responses.

methodsNinety-five selected iNPH patients (mean age 77, SD 6, 57% male), underwent CSF TT prior to shunt surgery. Clinical tests comprised different static balance tests in varying conditions including feet and heels apart and together; eyes open and closed; on floor and foam cushion, followed by gait and functional performance measures including 10-meter walk test (10MWT), 3-meter backward walking (3MBW), Timed-up and Go (TUG) and 6-minute walking test (6MWT). Duration in seconds (sec) and distance were noted. Assessments were conducted at set time points before and after the drainage procedure. Changes in performance were analyzed, and responses compared between sexes.

resultsSignificant increase was observed across most static balance tests except tandem eyes closed (EC) and one-legged stance tests. The largest enhancements were seen in the Romberg test (4.9 s), followed by foam cushion-eyes open (EO) tests (feet together: 3.9 s and heels together: 3.8 s), heels together-EC (3.8 s) and tandem-EO (3.1 s). Gait and functional tests significantly improved (p < 0.001) and 3MBW showed the largest change, with a 32% reduction in sec and a 23% reduction in steps, followed by decrease in TUG sec (27%) and 10-MWT sec (21%), and 6MWT distance increase (25%). Males demonstrated significant increase in heels together-EO and feet together-EO duration which were not observed in females; after adjusting for baseline performances, no significant sex-related differences in responsiveness to CSF TT were found.

conclusionsChallenging comprehensive physiotherapy tests, including gait assessments in direction and capacity, such as 3MBW and 6MWT, together with postural control evaluations using foam cushion and tandem stance increases the sensitivity to change and are suggested to be used to detect functional changes after CSF TT in patients with iNPH. TRAIL REGISTRATION: The project is registered in "FoU inSweden” (Research and Development in Sweden) ID: 285356.

Indexed as

GaitHydrocephalus, Normal PressurePhysical Therapy ModalitiesPostural BalanceSpinal PunctureAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleSensitivity and SpecificityBalanceCerebrospinal fluidIdiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalusLumbar punctureOutcome assessmentPhysical therapy modalitiesPostural functionTap testTreatment effectivenessWalk test

Identifiers

PMID41703573
PMCPMC12931076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.