Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41703572›Full record

Trial reportBMC medical education2026

The effect of high-fidelity simulation on nursing students' self-confidence and stress levels during patient intervention: a randomized controlled trial.

Seher Yurt, Gizem Açıkgoz, Zahide Aksoy, Feride Saruhan Akgun, Ayşen Demirel, Özge Karaca, Gülten Okuroğlu

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06454786 (The Effect of Training Given by Simulation Method on the Self-confidence and Stress Levels of Nursing Students in Patient Intervention), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06454786 naunknown statusnot on this map

The Effect of Training Given by Simulation Method on the Self-confidence and Stress Levels of Nursing Students in Patient Intervention

TypeinterventionalSponsorSeher YurtRan2024 to 2024Enrolled90ConditionsSimulation Training, Nursing Student, Self Confidence, StressArmsSimulation Method
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Seher YurtHealth Science Faculty, Nursing Department, İstanbul Kent University, İstanbul, Turkey.
Gizem AçıkgozHealth Science Faculty, Nursing Department, İstanbul Kent University, İstanbul, Turkey.
Zahide AksoyHealth Science Faculty, Nursing Department, İstanbul Kent University, İstanbul, Turkey. aksoyzahide@outlook.com.
Feride Saruhan AkgunHealth Science Faculty, Nursing Department, İstanbul Kent University, İstanbul, Turkey.
Ayşen DemirelHealth Science Faculty, Nursing Department, İstanbul Kent University, İstanbul, Turkey.
Özge KaracaHealth Science Faculty, Nursing Department, Marmara University, İstanbul, Turkey.
Gülten OkuroğluHealth Science Faculty, Nursing Department, Marmara University, İstanbul, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh-fidelity simulation provides a safe and effective learning environment in nursing education, supporting the development of clinical competence and patient safety. This randomized controlled trial aimed to examine the effect of high-fidelity simulation on nursing students’ self-confidence and perceived stress levels during patient care interventions.

methodsThe study included 38 senior nursing students who completed a pretest consisting of the Student Identification Form, the Self-Confidence in Intervening with Patients Scale, and the Perceived Stress Scale. The experimental group participated in a simulated shock scenario using high-fidelity simulation, while the control group received routine theoretical instruction. Posttests were administered to both groups two weeks after the intervention. The data obtained in the study were statistically analyzed using SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) version 25.0 for Windows. The study adhered to the CONSORT 2010 guidelines.

resultsNo statistically significant differences were found between the experimental and control groups in posttest total scores of self-confidence or perceived stress (p > 0.05). However, within-group analysis indicated significant improvements in the experimental group’s self-confidence total score and in the subdimensions of clinical practice and psychological support (p < 0.05). These improvements demonstrate that students’ clinical performance during patient care interventions is supported.

conclusionHigh-fidelity simulation training significantly enhanced nursing students’ self-confidence during patient care interventions, whereas perceived stress levels did not differ significantly within or between groups. These findings support the integration of high-fidelity simulation into nursing curricula to enhance students’ clinical preparedness. Further studies with larger and diverse samples are recommended to strengthen the evidence base. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: “ https://ClinicalTrials.gov "; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06454786 [Registration date 2024/06/06].

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceHigh Fidelity Simulation TrainingSelf ConceptStress, PsychologicalStudents, NursingAdultFemaleHumansMalePatient SimulationSubjective StressYoung AdultHigh-fidelity simulationNursing educationPatient carePerceived stressRandomized controlled trialSelf-confidenceSimulation-based education

Identifiers

PMID41703572
PMCPMC13020100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.