ArticleCritical care (London, England)2026
Differential carbon dioxide in awake peripheral veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a neglected clinical challenge.
Article in Critical care (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Awake veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) is increasingly used to provide circulatory support while avoiding sedation and mechanical ventilation. While differential hypoxemia is well recognized, differential carbon dioxide (CO₂) remains poorly explored, especially in awake patients with preserved respiratory drive. We describe a 38-year-old patient with severe dilated cardiomyopathy, severe mitral regurgitation and cardiogenic shock supported with awake femoro-femoral VA ECMO as a bridge to heart transplant. Initial settings included 2.6 L/min of blood flow and 1 L/min of sweep gas. On day three, bilateral arterial sampling demonstrated marked differential carbon dioxide: right arm PaCO₂ 17 mmHg (pH 7.58) versus left arm PaCO₂ 40 mmHg (pH 7.35). Increasing the sweep gas flow to 2 L/min substantially reduced this gradient, yielding similar PaCO₂ values (30 vs. 29 mmHg) without hemodynamic instability. The mixing point was likely located between the innominate and left subclavian arteries; potentially, creating asymmetric perfusion and exposing the brain to heterogeneous CO₂ tensions. Differential CO₂ exchange may occur despite preserved pulmonary function. Resulting regional hypocapnia can induce cerebral vasoconstriction, potentially compromising cerebral blood flow in vulnerable awake VA ECMO patients. Detection requires bilateral arterial blood gases and careful sweep gas titration together with serial neurologic assessment. Neuromonitoring tools such as near-infrared spectroscopy, electroencephalography, and transcranial doppler may assist in evaluating cerebrovascular effects. Differential carbon dioxide is an underrecognized but clinically relevant phenomenon in awake VA-ECMO. Systematic detection and individualized CO₂ management are essential to reduce neurological risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.