Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41703551›Full record

Observational studyBMC women's health2026

Central sensitization in women with endometriosis: a cross-sectional study.

Anna Biasioli, Francesca Previtera, Ilaria Mazzera, Matilde Degano, Silvia Zermano, Veronica Tius, Ilaria Piacenti, Renato Seracchioli, Diego Raimondo, Monica Della Martina and 4 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Anna BiasioliClinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Santa Maria della Misericordia University Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Piazzale Santa Maria della Misericordia 15, Udine, 33100, Italy.
Francesca PreviteraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, ASST Bergamo Est, Via Paderno 21, Seriate, Bergamo, 24068, Italy.
Ilaria MazzeraDepartment of Medicine (DMED), University of Udine, Via Colugna 50, Udine, 33100, Italy.
Matilde DeganoClinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Santa Maria della Misericordia University Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Piazzale Santa Maria della Misericordia 15, Udine, 33100, Italy.
Silvia ZermanoClinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Santa Maria della Misericordia University Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Piazzale Santa Maria della Misericordia 15, Udine, 33100, Italy.
Veronica TiusDepartment of Medicine (DMED), University of Udine, Via Colugna 50, Udine, 33100, Italy.
Ilaria PiacentiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Santa Maria Hospital, Viale Tristano di Joannuccio, Terni, 05100, Italy.
Renato SeracchioliDivision of Gynecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Policlinico di Sant'Orsola, Via Giuseppe Massarenti 9, Bologna, 40138, Italy.
Diego RaimondoDivision of Gynecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Policlinico di Sant'Orsola, Via Giuseppe Massarenti 9, Bologna, 40138, Italy.
Monica Della MartinaClinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Santa Maria della Misericordia University Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Piazzale Santa Maria della Misericordia 15, Udine, 33100, Italy.
Martina ArcieriClinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Santa Maria della Misericordia University Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Piazzale Santa Maria della Misericordia 15, Udine, 33100, Italy.
Stefano RestainoClinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Santa Maria della Misericordia University Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Piazzale Santa Maria della Misericordia 15, Udine, 33100, Italy.
Lorenza DriulClinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Santa Maria della Misericordia University Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Piazzale Santa Maria della Misericordia 15, Udine, 33100, Italy.
Giuseppe VizzielliClinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Santa Maria della Misericordia University Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Piazzale Santa Maria della Misericordia 15, Udine, 33100, Italy. giuseppe.vizzielli@uniud.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPain is the primary symptom of endometriosis and may progress into a chronic, acyclic condition driven by neuroinflammatory mechanisms, leading to neuropathic and ultimately nociplastic pain. Central sensitization, a form of nociplastic pain, is associated with various chronic pain syndromes collectively known as Central Sensitivity Syndromes, such as fibromyalgia and irritable bowel syndrome. These central mechanisms may contribute to treatment failure and symptom recurrence in endometriosis, significantly impacting quality of life. The Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI), initially validated in patients with fibromyalgia, has demonstrated utility in identifying central sensitization in those with endometriosis. The primary outcome of this study was to assess the prevalence of central sensitization in patients with a diagnosis of endometriosis/adenomyosis. The secondary objective was to evaluate the association between the patient's demographic and clinical characteristics and the diagnosis of central sensitization syndrome.

methodsThis was a single-center, observational, cross-sectional study. Between February 1, 2023, and August 31, 2023, we prospectively enrolled 142 patients with a diagnosis of endometriosis/adenomyosis, as determined by surgery/ultrasound, who attended the "Endometriosis and Pelvic Pain" unit within the Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinic in Udine. Demographic and clinical data were collected. The prevalence of central sensitization was assessed using a validated questionnaire, the Central Sensitization Inventory. A CSI score ≥ 40 was considered as an indicator of Central Sensitization Syndrome.

resultsThe prevalence of CS was 52.1%. Among the clinical characteristics, only dyspareunia and vulvodynia were significantly associated with CS in our patients (p < 0.001), while other symptoms and even the type of endometriosis were not. However, a significant association was found with the onset of symptoms being more than 5 years, compared to earlier-onset forms (p < 0.001). A strong association was also found between positive CSI and overlap syndromes.

conclusionsGiven the high prevalence of central sensitization based on the CSI among this tertiary-referral cohort, identifying it precociously might be useful for counseling patients and choosing a multimodal treatment in addition to conventional strategies. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings in broader and non-selected populations and to validate the applicability of the CSI questionnaire as a screening tool for central sensitization in common practice.

Indexed as

Central Nervous System SensitizationEndometriosisAdultChronic PainCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNociplastic PainPelvic PainPrevalenceProspective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesCentral sensitizationCentral sensitization inventoryChronic painEndometriosisNociplastic pain

Identifiers

PMID41703551
PMCPMC13015096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.