ArticleBMC oral health2026
Survey on the usage and frequency of digital magnification devices in dentistry.
Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the awareness, usage frequency, and perceptions of dental magnification devices (DMDs) among academic dental practitioners.
methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted at the Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry, which targeted academic staff, doctoral candidates, and specialization students. A total of 159 participants completed an 18-item multiple-choice questionnaire. The data were collected via email and QR codes and statistically analyzed via descriptive and inferential methods.
resultsThe results revealed increasing awareness and usage of DMDs, with ergonomic benefits and improved treatment precision being the most commonly cited advantages. Despite these benefits, barriers such as cost and concerns over device dependency have limited broader adoption. The participants indicated that magnification was particularly valuable in endodontics and restorative procedures.
conclusionThe findings emphasize the growing recognition of DMDs in academic dental practice and highlight the need to incorporate magnification training into dental education curricula to enhance clinical skills and ergonomic awareness from an early stage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.