Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41703515›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2026

The development and evaluation of a mentalization-based training program for multiple managerial layers: a study protocol.

Tanja Kirkegaard, Lennart Kiel, Majse Lind, Marie Skaalum Bloch, Stine Steen Høgenhaug, Stefan Lock Jensen, Trine Nøhr Winding, Lars Peter Sønderbo Andersen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tanja KirkegaardDepartment of Communication and Psychology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark. tanjak@ikk.aau.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0130-9977
Lennart KielDepartment of Communication and Psychology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7869-5082
Majse LindDepartment of Communication and Psychology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5837-8389
Marie Skaalum BlochPrivate Practice Clinic, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-3859-2255
Stine Steen HøgenhaugDepartment of Communication and Psychology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1153-4361
Stefan Lock JensenPsychiatry Region Zealand, Slagelse, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2097-5342
Trine Nøhr WindingDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, University Research Clinic, Goedstrup Hospital, Herning, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2448-0403
Lars Peter Sønderbo AndersenDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, University Research Clinic, Goedstrup Hospital, Herning, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0320-7974

Funding

Velliv Foreningen F.M.B.A (tidligere Foreningen Norliv) 23-2113
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOccupational stress is a pressing issue for small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), which are particularly vulnerable due to limited resources and unique challenges. Effective leadership is pivotal in mitigating stress and promoting workplace well-being, yet existing leadership training programs often lack a focus on relational competencies, which has been found as a core competency in fostering well-being among both leaders and employees. This study aims to evaluate a mentalization-based leadership training program designed to enhance relational competencies and improve employee and leader well-being in SMEs.

methodsThe intervention study uses a quasi-experimental design with repeated measures at four time points. The estimated inclusion of participants counts 100 leaders and 700 employees from SMEs across various industries in Denmark. The program integrates mentalization theory with relational leadership theory, focusing on enhancing leaders’ capacity to mentalize, which is the capacity to understand and interpret mental states in oneself and others. The training program consists of five monthly in-person modules and four online modules. Linear mixed-effects models are used to examine effectiveness, and a mixed-method process-evaluation is applied to evaluate the implementation and training transfer. DISCUSSION: This study addresses critical gaps in leadership training by targeting relational competencies necessary for enhancing well-being among employees and leaders. The study hypothesizes that the training program will enhance leader and employee well-being, foster psychological safety and improve the psychosocial safety climate. Changes in leaders’ mentalizing capacity and relational leadership behaviors are anticipated to mediate these outcomes. By emphasizing mentalization as a core relational competency, the findings aim to contribute to evidence-based strategies for improving occupational mental health in SMEs, offering practical implications for public health interventions.

trial registrationThis study was registered on the Open Science Framework (OSF) under the identifier https://osf.io/4nwc8 on October 20, 2024.

Indexed as

LeadershipMentalizationOccupational StressDenmarkHumansProgram DevelopmentProgram EvaluationEmployee well-beingLeader-member exchange (LMX)Leadership trainingLeader well-beingMentalizingPsychological safetyPsychosocial safety climateRelational competenciesSmall and medium sized enterprisesWorkplace intervention

Identifiers

PMID41703515
PMCPMC13014992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.