ArticleBMC oral health2026
Complications of lower arch space maintainers in pediatric patients: a retrospective study.
Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSpace maintainers, including band and loop (BLSM) and lower lingual holding arch (LLHA) designs, preserve arch integrity in children. This study aimed to compare the clinical complications, patient comfort, and compliance between BLSM and LLHA appliances in children aged 6–12 years.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study included 88 space maintainers (44 BLSM and 44 LLHA). Dental records were reviewed to identify pediatric patients who had received space maintainers within the last two years. The identified patients were subsequently contacted and invited for a clinical examination to assess the current condition of the space maintainers and potential complications, including debonding, soft tissue irritation, delayed removal, appliance fracture, and dislodgment. A validated questionnaire was used to assess their experience with the appliance.
resultsChildren with LLHA were older (10.2 ± 1.3 years) than those with BLSM (8.1 ± 2.1 years) (p < 0.001). Complications occurred in 45.5% of appliances and were associated with LLHA and BLSM at similar rates. Based on bivariate analysis, LLHA was more often associated with transient speech disturbances (45.5%) than BLSM (9.1%) (p < 0.05). Pain was more frequent in the LLHA group (p < 0.05). Based on adjusted logistic regression, children with LLHA were more likely to report pain in the last month preceding the clinical examination of this study (OR = 3.2; 95% CI: 0.6–18.5) than those with BLSM, although this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.195). LLHA showed a significant association with increased speech interference in the first month post-insertion, with an odds ratio of 5.8 (95% CI: 1.6–20.6; p = 0.007), compared to the BLSM.
conclusionAdaptation of pediatric patients to LLHA and BLSM improved progressively over time. Both appliances demonstrated similar rates of clinical complications. Patients with LLHA experienced greater early speech difficulties than those with BLSM did. By prioritizing patient-centered outcomes, this study offers valuable insights for clinical decision-making and lays the groundwork for future robust prospective studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.