ArticleBMC cancer2026
Time to haematologist visit and non-haematological referral from primary health care during blood cancer diagnosis - findings from a large national survey in Australia.
Article in BMC cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBlood cancers are the third most common cancer in Australia. However, little is known about their diagnostic pathway in the Australian context. This research aimed to assess the interval between first primary health care (PHC) contact and first haematologist visit, and referrals to specialists other than haematologists (non-haematological referrals) during blood cancer diagnoses.
methodsAn online national survey was conducted with patients living with blood cancers, such as leukaemia, lymphoma, multiple myeloma, myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) and myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) between October and November 2022. Univariate and adjusted logistic regression models were applied to examine sociodemographic factors (age, sex, income, residence location, country of birth, private health insurance) and type of blood cancers associated with extended PHC-haematologist visit intervals (> 1-month) and non-haematological referrals.
resultsOf the total 1758 participants, 26.3% (95% CI 24.3, 28.4%) patients experienced an extended PHC-haematologist visit interval (> 1-month) and of 1749 participants, 24.8% (95% CI 22.8, 26.9%) patients experienced non-haematological referrals during their diagnosis stage. Women were more likely to report an extended PHC-haematologist visit interval (adjusted odds ratio aOR 1.38, 95% CI 1.10, 1.73) or non-haematological referrals (aOR 1.42, 95%CI 1.12, 1.80). Regional Australians (aOR 1.37, 95%CI 1.08, 1.73) were more likely to experience an extended PHC -haematologist visit interval, but the odds of non-haematological referrals was not significant for them. Being older (≥ 65 years) (aOR 0.59, 95% CI 0.36, 0.97) and overseas-born (aOR 0.73, 95%CI 0.54, 0.99) were associated with a lower likelihood of non-haematological referrals. Private insurance holders (aOR 1.19, 95% CI 1.05, 1.35) were also more likely to have specialist referrals other than haematologists. Patients with an indolent type of blood cancers, such as lymphomas, multiple myeloma and MDS, are more likely to experience an extended PHC-haematologist visit interval or non-haematological referrals.
conclusionsA multi-pronged approach, including raising awareness of blood cancer signs and symptoms among both patients and health care professionals and improving access to GPs and specialist services, particularly in regional and rural Australia, is required to improve timely help-seeking during diagnosis. More evidence is also needed on clusters of non-specific symptoms indicative of haematological cancers underpinning guidelines and optimal care pathways to support possible use of automated software prompts and prompt diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.