ArticleBMC plant biology2026
Targeted capture and cloning of Rps6 reveal redundancy in soybean resistance genes.
Article in BMC plant biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Rare Recombination in the Phytophthora sojae Genome Allows the Redefinition of a Major Avirulence Gene.Molecular plant pathology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Effective management of Phytophthora root rot in soybean is compromised by the rapid loss of efficacy of the most widely deployed resistance genes to Phytophthora sojae (Rps). However, some genes such as Rps3a and Rps6 are still offering a strong protection but are nonetheless rare in elite material, probably owing to the fact that they have never been properly characterized. In this study, we have employed RenSeq, and whole genome sequencing to unravel the nature of Rps6 as a complex locus composed of 10 NLR genes. In a cell death assay using soybean protoplasts, we show that one of the candidates from the cluster interacts robustly with Avr6. Transfer of the candidate gene into a susceptible root system confirmed its function and status as the bona fide Rps6. Through sequence comparison with other Rps differentials, we further discovered that Rps3c and Rps4, originally thought to be distinct genes on different chromosomes, are, in fact, the exact same resistance gene as Rps6, mediating recognition to the same effector, Avr6. These results clarify a long-standing confusion regarding the identity of some elusive Rps genes and offer the precise sequence and position of Rps6. At the same time, along with the recently exposed homology between Rps3b and Rps11, these findings raise some concerns about the apparent multiplicity of Rps genes. Indeed, there may be fewer sources of resistance than assumed, which should instill caution in using current Rps genes to ensure durable management of Phytophthora root rot.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.