ArticleJournal of public health dentistry2026
Oral Health Professionals' Views on the Interim Canada Dental Benefit in Manitoba, Canada.
Article in Journal of public health dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe Interim Canada Dental Benefit (CDB) provided financial support to families to cover dental care expenses for children < 12 years of age. The purpose of this study was to investigate oral health professionals' (OHPs) views of the Interim CDB.
methodsOHPs in Manitoba, Canada were invited by e-mail to complete an online questionnaire. Data analysis included descriptive statistics (frequencies, means, and standard deviations), bivariate analysis (chi-squared and t-test), and multivariable logistic regression. A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant.
resultsOverall, 383 OHPs participated, the majority being women (80.9%), from metropolitan areas (77.8%), and working for 16.6 ± 12.9 years. Main respondents included dentists (24.3%), dental hygienists (23.3%), and dental assistants (38.7%). Awareness of the benefit was high (92.7%) yet 45.8% were uncertain whether it increased public awareness of children's oral health. Encouragement to apply was low (39.3%), although 56.5% believed that the Interim CDB improved access to children's oral care. Multivariate logistic regression showed that rural OHPs encouraged application 43% more than those working in urban areas. Significantly more positive responses were observed among rural-based OHPs and women toward the benefit's ability to improve access to oral health for children.
conclusionsOverall, awareness was high among the OHPs, but uncertainty remained whether the benefit improved access to care for young children. OHPs in rural areas were more likely to believe that the Interim CDB improved access to care and were more likely to promote the program to families.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.