Evaluation of the InTempo path set for CyberKnife prostate and lung SBRT: A single-institution experience.

purposeThe InTempo adaptive imaging system is an important component of the Accuray CyberKnife System, designed to enhance the system's ability to track and correct tumor motion during treatment. However, a limitation of this feature is the reduction of available nodes for treatment planning. The impact of a reduced number of nodes on the quality of InTempo-based treatment plans has not previously been evaluated. This retrospective study aims to compare the dosimetry of CyberKnife plans with and without The InTempo path set for both prostate and lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT).

methodsThis study included twelve consecutive prostate SBRT patients and twenty selected lung SBRT patients. The selection criteria for the 20 lung patients were motivated by being able to construct a data set representative of common treatment tracking methods and dose prescriptions. To evaluate the impact of InTempo imaging, treatment plans were re-optimized using the same optimization parameters and machine settings, except for the path set with the maximum number of nodes. To ensure a fair comparison, the study plans were prescribed using identical planning target volume coverage as the clinical treatment plans. Statistical analyses were performed using mean and standard deviation, dose metric plots, and a two-sided Wilcoxon signed rank test with multiple testing correction to compare dose metrics between different path sets.

resultsNo statistically significant differences were observed among the Prostate, Prostate_Short, and their corresponding InTempo path sets in at least 8 of the 14 evaluated plan metrics, including prostate clinical tumor volume (CTV) V40Gy(%), conformity index, and homogeneity index. For example, the mean prostate CTV V40Gy (%) for the Prostate, Prostate_Short, and their corresponding InTempo path sets was 90.8 ± 4.7, 89.4 ± 4.7, 90.2 ± 3.9, 91.0 ± 7.0, respectively. However, compared with the Prostate path set, the Prostate_InTempo path set exhibited a statistically significant reduction in delivery time (p = 0.0010), number of beams, and bladder V18Gy (%), along with a statistically significant increase in the number of imaging beams (p = 0.0010). Additionally, Prostate_Short demonstrated statistically significant reductions in delivery time and number of beams compared with the Prostate path set, while the number of imaging beams remained statistically equivalent. In contrast, the Reduced_Prostate and Reduced_Prostate_InTempo sets consistently resulted in inferior dosimetric outcomes, with several plans deemed unoptimizable due to insufficient node availability. For lung SBRT, statistically significant differences were observed in delivery time and the number of imaging beams between plans with and without InTempo. However, no statistical differences were found in dose distribution metrics between these two lung groups.

conclusionsInTempo-compatible path sets do not significantly compromise plan quality for prostate or lung SBRT, provided adequate node availability. Specifically, the Prostate_InTempo and Prostate_Short path sets demonstrated a reduction in delivery time and an increase in adaptive imaging frequency compared with the Prostate path set. However, the Reduced_Prostate and Reduced_Prostate_InTempo result in inferior plan quality and reduced deliverability and should be used with caution. These findings support the selective use of InTempo imaging in SBRT planning without sacrificing dosimetric integrity.