Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41703381›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2026

Experiences of Social Risk Screening in the Safety-Net Among Patients with Mental Health Needs.

Stephanie S Loo, Shannon N Ogden, Jessica Ospina, Uma Devi Khemraj, Megan B Cole, Christine M Gunn, Pablo Buitron de la Vega, Jack A Clark

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Stephanie S LooResearch and Evaluation, W2 Consulting Corporation, Laurel, MD, USA. sloo@w2consultingcorp.com.ORCID 0000-0002-2733-7426
Shannon N OgdenDepartment of Health Law, Policy, and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Jessica OspinaDepartment of Health Law, Policy, and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Uma Devi KhemrajSection of General Internal Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Megan B ColeDepartment of Health Law, Policy, and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Christine M GunnDepartment of Health Law, Policy, and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Pablo Buitron de la VegaSection of General Internal Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA. pbuitro1@bu.edu.
Jack A ClarkDepartment of Health Law, Policy, and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

AHRQ HHS T32 HS022242
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSocial risk screening is a significant expansion of clinical care that raises a complexity of challenges for healthcare providers and patients alike.

objectiveTo understand the experience of responding to social risk screens among patients with mental health needs, how they prioritize health-related social needs when seeking care, and the impact of social risk screening on the patient-health system relationship.

designQualitative study; one-on-one key informant interviews.

participantsPrimary care patients at an academic urban safety-net hospital in Boston, MA. APPROACH: Primary data were collected via qualitative interviews with patients who presented at primary care with a mental health concern (e.g., depression, anxiety) in the past 1-3 months and completed a social risk screening from December 2020 to August 2021. Interviews were held via Zoom in English, audio-recorded and transcribed. Interviews focused on patients' experience of being screened for social risks and needs, their conceptualizations of social risk domains (e.g., housing, food, transportation, etc.), and the importance of these needs relative to medical care access. A deductive analysis using the Information-Motivation-Behavioral Skills model was applied to identify themes. KEY

resultsA total of 148 individuals were approached with 30 participating in semi-structured interviews (20.3% recruitment rate): 19 (63%) participants self-identified as female and 14 (47%) as Black/African American. Data revealed that asking patients about their social needs further emphasizes their already vulnerable position when seeking medical care, particularly when addressing mental health concerns. Patients stated that they were reluctant to disclose future health-related social needs when prior reported needs were not supported or addressed.

conclusionsWhen patients reported prior instances of sharing health-related social needs where those needs went unaddressed, instances of "double loss" occurred, leading to potential distrust in the medical system. It is important that health systems implement effective referral processes and have adequate resources to address patient disclosed needs, especially for at-risk patient populations.

Indexed as

Mass ScreeningMental DisordersSafety-net ProvidersAdultAgedBostonFemaleHealth Services Needs and DemandHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareQualitative ResearchRisk Assessmentdouble lossInformation-Motivation-Behavioral Skills frameworkmental healthprimary carequalitative interviewssocial risk screening

Identifiers

PMID41703381
PMCPMC13493669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.