Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41703353›Full record

ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2026

Working memory supports rapid talker and accent accommodation: An individual differences investigation.

Drew J McLaughlin, Grace E Teuscher, Melissa M Baese-Berk, Kristin J Van Engen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Drew J McLaughlinDepartment of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA. dmclaughlin.research@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4581-9031
Grace E TeuscherDepartment of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Melissa M Baese-BerkDepartment of Linguistics, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA.
Kristin J Van EngenDepartment of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.

Funding

European Union 101103964Eusko Jaurlaritza BERC 2022-2025 programFundación Carmen y Severo Ochoa CEX2020-001010-SNational Science Foundation 2146993National Science Foundation BCS-2020805National Science Foundation DGE-1745038
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Under multitalker listening conditions, listeners appear to rapidly accommodate variability in speaker productions. However, evidence indicates that this trial-to-trial accommodation incurs a processing cost and is amplified by accent differences among talkers. The present study investigated how individual listener differences in working memory capacity and attentional control may predict the degree of processing costs (as measured by response time and accuracy) incurred by trial-to-trial switches in English talkers of first language (L1) American accent and second language (L2) Mandarin Chinese accent. Listeners completed a dual-task experiment with a primary listening task and secondary non-linguistic task as well as measures of working memory capacity (the Word Auditory Recognition and Recall Measure) and attentional control (the Trail Making Test and a Stroop Test). Results indicated that, on trials with a talker switch, listeners with smaller working memory capacities were slower to respond to the secondary task and had poorer recognition accuracy for the primary task. The measures of attentional control did not predict switching costs. One marginal interaction emerged between Stroop test scores (typically used to assess selective attention and inhibitory control) and the accent manipulation, such that listeners with better attentional control had marginally better overall recognition accuracy for L2 accent. Working memory capacity, on the other hand, did not predict differences in recognition accuracy between accent conditions. We conclude that working memory plays a critical role in supporting rapid (trial-to-trial) talker accommodation. Attentional control may support processing of L2 accent more generally but not be critical for rapid accommodation.

Indexed as

AttentionExecutive FunctionIndividualityMemory, Short-TermMultilingualismSpeech PerceptionAdultDual-Task TestsFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultAccentSpeech perceptionTalker accommodationWorking memory

Identifiers

PMID41703353
PMCPMC12913305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.