ArticleBrain topography2026
The Impact of Brain Tumors and Craniotomy Lesions on Scalp EEG.
Article in Brain topography, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Electroencephalography (EEG) is widely used in both research and clinical settings, yet its accuracy can be significantly impacted by subject-specific anatomical anomalies such as brain lesions and skull defects. This study investigates the effects of glioma-related brain lesions and craniotomy-induced bone discontinuities on scalp-recorded EEG signals. To do this, single- and multi-source simulations were created using individualized forward models with and without these structural anomalies. We assessed changes in signal amplitude and topography, and identified the most affected electrodes. Furthermore, real EEG recordings were also analyzed longitudinally to evaluate how these anomalies influence the topography and source localization of early auditory evoked responses (P1 and N1 ERP components). Both single- and multi-source simulations showed that the distortions in the EEG signals depend on the location of the neural source in relation to the location of the lesion. Electrode-level analyses showed that these distortions were most pronounced at the electrodes near the bone flap, and thus near the lesions. Real ERP data supported these findings: a subject with a lesion near the auditory cortex showed notable topographic deviations longitudinally for the P1 and N1 ERP components, while a subject with a frontal lesion showed minimal changes in the scalp EEG. These results highlight the need to include detailed brain and skull anatomy in EEG models, especially in studies that track longitudinal changes in clinical populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.