ArticleCommunications biology2026
CD25 modulation enhances broadly neutralizing antibody response of SARS-CoV-2 subunit vaccine.
Article in Communications biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The primary aim of COVID-19 vaccine development is to induce highly efficient broadly neutralizing antibodies (bNAbs) against circulating and emergent SARS-CoV-2 variants. Rapid and sustained germinal center (GC) responses at an early stage are crucial to produce bNAbs. However, the mechanisms underlying the formation of early GC responses and strategies to effectively promote these responses remain to be further investigated. In this study, we found that the combination of anti-CD25 monoclonal antibodies (mAb) with the COVID-19 subunit vaccine significantly enhances cross-reactive neutralizing antibody responses in mice. Modulation of CD25 at different time points before and after vaccination resulted in varying effects on the GC response, with day 0 being the most effective in assisting the vaccine to induce a stronger GC response. This enhancement is achieved by rapidly inhibiting regulatory T (Treg) cells in draining lymph nodes, an effect observed not only in antigen-specific subsets but also across the bulk lymphocyte population-thereby creating a pro-immune microenvironment that facilitates the induction of an effective early GC response. This leads to the generation of more antigen-recognizing B cells and significantly increases both the potency and breadth of neutralizing antibody responses. Our findings propose a strategy to enhance vaccine efficacy against SARS-CoV-2 and other hypervariable pathogens by effectively promoting the development of early and robust GC responses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.