Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41703311›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2026

LeCoder: A large-scale automated coder for coding errors in word-production tasks.

Shanhua Hu, Delaney DuVal, Brielle C Stark, Nazbanou Nozari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shanhua HuDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University Bloomington, 1101 E 10th St., Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA. sh59@iu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-1241-6937
Delaney DuValDepartment of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Brielle C StarkCognitive Science Program, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Nazbanou NozariDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University Bloomington, 1101 E 10th St., Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA.

Funding

National Science Foundation BCS-2317121
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Speech errors have been instrumental in advancing our understanding of the architecture of the language production system, the nature of its representations, and its disorders. To be most informative, researchers usually need large amounts of data. Hand-coding such data can be both cumbersome and subjective. This paper presents LeCoder, the first open-source, automated error coder for English word and naming data, which uses a data-driven approach grounded in large-scale corpora to quantify the target-response relationship, allowing it to be flexible, scalable, and generalizable across new datasets. By testing the coder on two datasets from two aphasia labs that have been carefully coded by trained research assistants, we first establish that LeCoder has high accuracy when compared to expert coders, and in certain cases, offers a more logical categorization than human coders. We then show, using robust machine-learning approaches, that LeCoder's performance generalizes to new participants and items it has never encountered before. Collectively, these findings encourage the use of LeCoder across labs for more objective coding of speech errors, which will, in turn, increase replicability of findings in all subfields of research that use speech error analysis, including neuropsychological research.

Indexed as

SpeechAphasiaHumansLanguageMachine LearningAphasiaAutomated codingPhonological similaritySemantic similaritySpeech errors

Identifiers

PMID41703311
PMCPMC12913347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.