Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41703280›Full record

ReviewChirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026

[Balancing act between infection protection by hygiene measures and sustainability in surgery].

Julia Seifert, Axel Kramer

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Julia SeifertKlinik für Unfallchirurgie und Orthopädie, Unfallkrankenhaus Berlin, Warenerstr. 7, 12683, Berlin, Deutschland. Julia.seifert@ukb.de.
Axel KramerInstitut für Hygiene und Umweltmedizin der Universitätsmedizin, Greifswald, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using selected examples from the fields of disinfection, antiseptics, perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis, disposable medical gloves, workwear and protective clothing, air conditioning systems, architectural modifications and recycling of recyclable medical products used in surgery, it is shown that the carbon footprint of inpatient and outpatient surgical facilities can be reduced by implementing infection control measures appropriate to the indications without compromising the safety of patients and staff.

Indexed as

Cross InfectionHygieneInfection ControlSurgical Wound InfectionDisinfectionGloves, SurgicalHumansProtective ClothingArchitectural modificationsCarbon footprintDisposable medical glovesProtective clothingRecycling

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.