Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41703273›Full record

ArticleInfection2026

Clinical data on symptomatic cutaneous reinfections due to Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato in Slovenia.

Franc Strle, Katarina Ogrinc, Vera Maraspin, Stanka Lotrič-Furlan, Tereza Rojko, Eva Ružić-Sabljić, Andrej Kastrin, Klemen Strle, Gary P Wormser, Petra Bogovič

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06835075 (Clinicaly Manifested Reinfections with Borrelia Burgdorferi Sensu Lato), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06835075 active not recruitingnot on this map

Clinicaly Manifested Reinfections with Borrelia Burgdorferi Sensu Lato

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity Medical Centre LjubljanaRan2024 to 2027Enrolled15,000ConditionsLyme Borreliosis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Franc StrleDepartment of Infectious Diseases, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Japljeva 2, 1525, Ljubljana, Slovenia. franc.strle@kclj.si.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4163-0503
Katarina OgrincDepartment of Infectious Diseases, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Japljeva 2, 1525, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Vera MaraspinDepartment of Infectious Diseases, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Japljeva 2, 1525, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Stanka Lotrič-FurlanDepartment of Infectious Diseases, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Japljeva 2, 1525, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Tereza RojkoDepartment of Infectious Diseases, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Japljeva 2, 1525, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Eva Ružić-SabljićUniversity of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Andrej KastrinUniversity of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Klemen StrleTufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Gary P WormserNew York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA.
Petra BogovičDepartment of Infectious Diseases, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Japljeva 2, 1525, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Funding

National Institutes of Health [National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases] R21AI144916 and R21AI14927802Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency P3-0296, J3-7086, and J3-8195University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Slovenia 20220144
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSymptomatic reinfections with Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato occur, but their clinical and microbiologic characteristics are insufficiently defined. It, therefore, remains unclear whether having had a primary infection influences the presentation or course of reinfection.

methodsWe compared the clinical and microbiologic findings in patients with primary infection versus reinfection, with each episode presenting with erythema migrans (EM). The analysis included a cohort of patients diagnosed with EM between 1990 and 2014 at an outpatient clinic in Slovenia.

resultsA total of 11,169 patients with EM were included, comprising 635 reinfections and 10,534 primary infections. Patients with reinfection were older (56 vs 48 years; p < 0.001), less frequently had multiple EM lesions (4.4% vs 7.3%; p = 0.022), and less often reported local symptoms at the EM site (42.5% vs 53.6%; p < 0.001). Reinfected patients were less often Borrelia IgM seropositive (35.0% vs 43.6%; p = 0.028) and more often IgG seropositive (63.0% vs 52.8%; p = 0.011). The rate of Borrelia isolation from EM skin lesions, however, was similar in both groups (53%). Reinfections were more frequent in immunocompromised than in immunocompetent patients (6.8% vs 2.4%; p < 0.001).

conclusionsCompared with primary infection, EM due to reinfection shows distinct clinical and serologic features and is less often disseminated. The increased frequency of reinfection among immunocompromised patients supports a role of host immunity in protection against Borrelia reinfection.

trial registrationNCT06835075.

Indexed as

Borrelia burgdorferi GroupLyme DiseaseAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, BacterialErythema Chronicum MigransFemaleHumansImmunoglobulin MMaleMiddle AgedRecurrenceSloveniaYoung AdultAntibodies, BacterialImmunoglobulin MBorrelia burgdorferi sensu latoCohort studyErythema migransLyme borreliosisReinfection

Identifiers

PMID41703273
PMCPMC13323111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.