ArticleInfection2026
Clinical data on symptomatic cutaneous reinfections due to Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato in Slovenia.
Article in Infection, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06835075 (Clinicaly Manifested Reinfections with Borrelia Burgdorferi Sensu Lato), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Clinicaly Manifested Reinfections with Borrelia Burgdorferi Sensu Lato
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSymptomatic reinfections with Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato occur, but their clinical and microbiologic characteristics are insufficiently defined. It, therefore, remains unclear whether having had a primary infection influences the presentation or course of reinfection.
methodsWe compared the clinical and microbiologic findings in patients with primary infection versus reinfection, with each episode presenting with erythema migrans (EM). The analysis included a cohort of patients diagnosed with EM between 1990 and 2014 at an outpatient clinic in Slovenia.
resultsA total of 11,169 patients with EM were included, comprising 635 reinfections and 10,534 primary infections. Patients with reinfection were older (56 vs 48 years; p < 0.001), less frequently had multiple EM lesions (4.4% vs 7.3%; p = 0.022), and less often reported local symptoms at the EM site (42.5% vs 53.6%; p < 0.001). Reinfected patients were less often Borrelia IgM seropositive (35.0% vs 43.6%; p = 0.028) and more often IgG seropositive (63.0% vs 52.8%; p = 0.011). The rate of Borrelia isolation from EM skin lesions, however, was similar in both groups (53%). Reinfections were more frequent in immunocompromised than in immunocompetent patients (6.8% vs 2.4%; p < 0.001).
conclusionsCompared with primary infection, EM due to reinfection shows distinct clinical and serologic features and is less often disseminated. The increased frequency of reinfection among immunocompromised patients supports a role of host immunity in protection against Borrelia reinfection.
trial registrationNCT06835075.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.