Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41703261›Full record

ArticleMemory & cognition2026

It's easier to forget what you want: Directed forgetting of chosen and unchosen words.

Kathleen L Hourihan, Tracy L Taylor

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Memory & cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kathleen L HourihanDepartment of Psychology, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, A1B 3X9, Canada. khourihan@mun.ca.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1087-9915
Tracy L TaylorDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-6866-9838

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada DG 418242-2013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In item-method directed forgetting (DF), participants are instructed to either remember or forget individual items in a study list. When memory for all items is tested, memory is better for remember than for forget items: the DF effect. Research has shown repeatedly that when participants can choose items for re-study, honoring those choices results in superior memory. In a series of experiments examining whether choice influences DF, participants completed an initial choice phase in which they selected words that they wanted to study. In Experiments 1 and 2, the study phase honored half of their choices (remember cues for chosen items, forget cues for non-chosen items), but dishonored half of their choices. Results show that item choice strongly influences DF, with a larger magnitude DF effect when choices are honored compared to control items. Remarkably, dishonored choices resulted in a reversed DF effect: higher recognition of forget-cued than remember-cued words. Experiment 3 showed that the effect did not replicate in participants who received yoked participants' choices, and Experiment 4 showed that although the larger DF effect for honored choices (relative to control) dissipated after a delay, the DF effect for dishonored choices was eliminated (although not reversed). Experiment 5 suggested that participants may consider different information if choosing items they do not want to study (rather than ones they do want to study), resulting in similar (smaller) DF effects for honored and dishonored choices. The roles of choice and reminding in preventing forgetting are discussed.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorMental RecallRecognition, PsychologyAdultCuesHumansYoung AdultChoiceDirected forgettingMemoryRecognition

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.