ArticleMemory & cognition2026
It's easier to forget what you want: Directed forgetting of chosen and unchosen words.
Article in Memory & cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In item-method directed forgetting (DF), participants are instructed to either remember or forget individual items in a study list. When memory for all items is tested, memory is better for remember than for forget items: the DF effect. Research has shown repeatedly that when participants can choose items for re-study, honoring those choices results in superior memory. In a series of experiments examining whether choice influences DF, participants completed an initial choice phase in which they selected words that they wanted to study. In Experiments 1 and 2, the study phase honored half of their choices (remember cues for chosen items, forget cues for non-chosen items), but dishonored half of their choices. Results show that item choice strongly influences DF, with a larger magnitude DF effect when choices are honored compared to control items. Remarkably, dishonored choices resulted in a reversed DF effect: higher recognition of forget-cued than remember-cued words. Experiment 3 showed that the effect did not replicate in participants who received yoked participants' choices, and Experiment 4 showed that although the larger DF effect for honored choices (relative to control) dissipated after a delay, the DF effect for dishonored choices was eliminated (although not reversed). Experiment 5 suggested that participants may consider different information if choosing items they do not want to study (rather than ones they do want to study), resulting in similar (smaller) DF effects for honored and dishonored choices. The roles of choice and reminding in preventing forgetting are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41703261What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.