ArticleScientific reports2026
Evaluation of bacteriophage efficacy against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in ex vivo and in vitro canine skin systems.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an opportunistic pathogen responsible for chronic infections in both human and veterinary medicine, with biofilm formation and multidrug resistance posing major clinical challenges. The efficacy of two bacteriophages, JG003 and PTLAW1, alone and in combination, was evaluated. In vitro biofilms grown on abiotic 96-well plates showed significant reduction after treatment with individual bacteriophages or their combination, as confirmed by confocal microscopy. To better simulate physiological conditions, efficacy was assessed using an epidermal equivalent model and an ex vivo canine skin model. In the ex vivo system, bacteriophage treatment reduced bacterial load by 4 logs, as confirmed by scanning electron microscopy and immunofluorescence imaging. In the epidermal equivalent model, bacteriophage therapy decreased bacterial counts and CXCL8 levels without inducing cytotoxicity or disrupting the skin barrier. Integration of in vitro and ex vivo systems bridges the gap between traditional biofilm assays and in vivo studies. The use of Franz-type diffusion cells provides a physiologically relevant platform for evaluating topical bacteriophage delivery and skin permeation. These findings establish a reproducible preclinical framework for biofilm-targeted therapies, demonstrating that bacteriophage combinations effectively reduce Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms and inflammation on skin, supporting their potential for wound treatment in both human and veterinary medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.