Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41703253›Full record

Observational studyEye (London, England)2026

Variations in prevalence of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) and completeness of screening in five units within a South African region: a register-based study.

Tshilidzi Van der Lecq, Gerd Holmström, Esmè Jordaan, Phumza Nongena, Natasha Rhoda, Rudzani Muloiwa, ROPSA Collaborative Group

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Eye (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tshilidzi Van der LecqDepartment of Surgery, Division of Ophthalmology, Groote Schuur Hospital, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa. Tshilidzi.vanderlecq@uct.ac.za.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4712-453X
Gerd HolmströmDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Ophthalmology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5600-7186
Esmè JordaanBiostatistics Research unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa.
Phumza NongenaDepartment of Paediatrics & Child Health, New Somerset Hospital, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9256-270X
Natasha RhodaDepartment of Paediatrics & Child Health, Mowbray Maternity Hospital, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Rudzani MuloiwaDepartment of Paediatrics & Child Health, Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
ROPSA Collaborative Group

Funding

South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC) Not applicable
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRetinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is an avoidable cause of childhood blindness. Effective ROP screening enables the detection of cases requiring treatment, but the frequency of ROP varies in units across South Africa (SA). Recent evidence suggests that a high proportion of infants in SA do not complete screening. A comparison of ROP prevalence and completeness of screening in units within the same region has yet to be described.

methodsA prospective study of infants screened for ROP at five units was conducted between 1 February 2023 and 30 April 2024 in Cape Town, SA. Data were extracted for infants with birth weight <1250 grams or gestational age <32 weeks from the Retinopathy of Prematurity South African (ROPSA) register.

resultsScreening was initiated in 933 infants and completed in 468 (50.2%). Completeness of screening varied in the units from 36.8% to 74.6%. The prevalence of ROP among infants who started screening (16.1%-71.2%), completed screening (13.1%-64.3%), and those incompletely screened (25.0%-79.2%) also varied in the units. Among those diagnosed with ROP (n = 315), 179 (56.8%) had incomplete screening, including 30 (n = 51, 58.8%) infants with stage 3 ROP.

conclusionCompleteness of screening and ROP prevalence varied widely in the units. Of concern is the high proportion of infants with ROP, including stage 3 ROP, who do not complete screening. Measures to increase completeness of screening are needed to improve the detection of cases requiring treatment. The ROPSA register will allow these improvements to be monitored over time.

Indexed as

Neonatal ScreeningRegistriesRetinopathy of PrematurityFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, Very Low Birth WeightMalePrevalenceProspective StudiesSouth Africa

Identifiers

PMID41703253
PMCPMC13061926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.