Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41703225›Full record

SynthesisPsychonomic bulletin & review2026

Emotion enhances relative but not absolute temporal memory: A meta-analysis.

Qun Ye, Chuang Ke

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Qun YeZhejiang Key Laboratory of Intelligent Education Technology and Application, Zhejiang Normal University, Zhejiang, 321004, Jinhua, China. qun.ye@zjnu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0589-5416
Chuang KeZhejiang Philosophy and Social Science Laboratory for the Mental Health and Crisis Intervention of Children and Adolescents, School of Psychology, Zhejiang Normal University, Zhejiang, 321004, Jinhua, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 32200912
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The extent to which emotion shapes memory for the temporal aspects of experience remains debated, with prior studies reporting conflicting results. To resolve these discrepancies, we conducted a comprehensive three-level meta-analysis of 33 studies (44 experiments, 79 effect sizes), systematically evaluating how emotion influences different forms of temporal memory-namely temporal order, temporal source, and temporal distance. Emotion selectively enhanced relative temporal memory: temporal order (Hedges's g = 0.35, 95% CI [0.11, 0.59]) and temporal source memory (g = 0.28, 95% CI [0.05, 0.51]) showed significant improvement. In contrast, no significant overall effects emerged for absolute temporal judgments (temporal distance: g = 0.06, 95% CI [-0.36, 0.49]). Moderator analyses identified that dynamic stimuli (e.g., videos) provided greater enhancement of temporal order memory than static materials, likely due to their inherent temporal structure and ecological validity. Additionally, pure lists of emotional items facilitated coherent encoding of event sequences more than mixed lists. These findings demonstrate that emotion's influence on temporal memory is selective rather than universal, with specific emotional characteristics and methodological factors critically determining the direction and magnitude of effects, thereby helping reconcile previous disparate findings. This work highlights the interplay of attentional allocation, contextual binding, and consolidation processes in shaping the mnemonic trace for "when."

Indexed as

EmotionsMemoryTime PerceptionHumansEmotionEpisodic memoryMeta-analysisTemporal memory

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.