ArticleScientific reports2026
Dynamic multi-objective aviation maintenance scheduling: an algorithmic framework.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aviation maintenance scheduling presents complex challenges due to dynamic task arrivals, stochastic service times, and the need to balance competing objectives. To address this, we introduce a novel framework that integrates these factors into a real-time, multi-objective optimization model. Our approach combines mathematical modeling with advanced meta-heuristic algorithms, supported by new theoretical performance guarantees. We evaluate nine algorithms across 810 experimental configurations, demonstrating that our proposed methods achieve statistically significant improvements over baseline scheduling approaches. Among single-objective metrics, Adaptive Tabu Search (ATS) achieves the lowest cost at $13,072 ± $4544, while multi-objective methods provide diverse Pareto fronts with a mean hypervolume of 0.0268 (normalized scale [0, 1]), dominating significantly more of the objective space than comparative methods. The framework demonstrates the potential for significant operational cost reductions and provides a robust theoretical foundation for developing next-generation maintenance scheduling systems.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.