Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41703174›Full record

ReviewPsychonomic bulletin & review2026

Brunswik's fundamental principle explained: A diffusion lens model of vicarious functioning.

Florian Scholten, Lukas Schumacher, Paul Kelber

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Florian ScholtenDepartment of Psychology, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Schleichstraße 4, 72076, Tübingen, Germany. florian.scholten@uni-tuebingen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-8296-1442
Lukas SchumacherUniversity of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1512-8288
Paul KelberDepartment of Psychology, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Schleichstraße 4, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4164-0007

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Egon Brunswik's theory of probabilistic functionalism, human prediction is conceptualized as an inductive inference process, in which cues are utilized as a lens to predict the probabilistically associated criterion in the environment. Dynamic cognitive adjustment, driven by the uncertainty of the individual and the substitutability of the environment, is based on vicarious functioning, the principle of learning from the frequency of co-occurrences. However, previous models of vicarious functioning, the multiple-regression lens and the fast-and-frugal lens, fail to explain how the individual reduces uncertainty while learning ecological cue validities. We therefore developed a diffusion lens model of vicarious functioning that captures dynamic cognitive adjustment to environments with multiple probabilistic and substitutable cues. A superstatistics approach allowed us to account for uncertainty reduction over time by an increasing sensitivity of the drift rate to the ecological validity of the cues. Additionally, the non-decision time is assumed to increase linearly with the number of presented cues to account for cue substitutability in the environment. The resulting model was validated by successfully fitting it to response time and choice data previously collected across multiple-cue probability learning tasks in diverse environments and scenarios. This suggests that the diffusion lens model can explain cognitive adjustment from an initial absence of knowledge to a near-perfect approximation of the probabilistic environment.

Indexed as

Models, PsychologicalProbability LearningCuesHumansUncertaintyCue probability learningDiffusion modelLens modelSuperstatistics

Identifiers

PMID41703174
PMCPMC12913299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.