Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41703173›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

EchoNet++: A multilingual soccer match audio commentary dataset.

Fahad Majeed, Maria Nazir, Marco Agus, Jens Schneider

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fahad MajeedCollege of Science and Engineering, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Doha, Qatar. fama44316@hbku.edu.qa.
Maria NazirDepartment of Computer Science and AI, CUQ Ulster University, Lusail, Qatar.
Marco AgusCollege of Science and Engineering, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Doha, Qatar.
Jens SchneiderCollege of Science and Engineering, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Doha, Qatar.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present a robust, multilingual, and multistage audio analysis pipeline for automatic processing of professional soccer match broadcasts. Rather than proposing a new standalone ASR model, this work introduces a reproducible end-to-end system and systematic component-level analysis that reveal how preprocessing, segmentation, transcription, and translation jointly affect performance under real-world broadcast conditions. The pipeline performs audio extraction, denoising, speech segmentation, transcription, and translation in a unified framework, enabling scalable, language-agnostic audio understanding. Audio is extracted from match videos using FFmpeg, transformed into the frequency domain via FFT, and filtered with a Butterworth bandpass filter (300 Hz-7 kHz) to isolate speech-relevant frequencies. We apply deep learning-based denoising using Demucs and segment speech regions using Silero VAD, followed by categorization of commentator and spectator streams based on temporal and density cues. Each speech segment is transcribed using multiple Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) models, including Whisper variants (Medium, Large, Turbo) and Insanely Fast Whisper, and non-English transcripts are translated into English. All results, including transcriptions, translations, and metadata (timestamps, segment labels, and language codes), are exported as match-structured JSON files. We evaluate our pipeline on full-match videos from Europe's top leagues, achieving low word error rates, accurate language detection, and consistent segmentation across diverse acoustic conditions. To support reproducible research and downstream tasks such as summarization and analytics, we will publicly release the dataset and processing pipeline.

Indexed as

MultilingualismSoccerDeep LearningHumansSpeechAudio denoising and segmentationAutomatic speech recognitionMultilingual audio processingSoccer broadcast commentary analysisVoice activity detection

Identifiers

PMID41703173
PMCPMC12988046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.