Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41703170›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Explainable machine learning for risk prediction of acute cardiac tamponade during atrial fibrillation ablation.

Lihua Zhou, Yafan Zhao, Wen Song, Yunxia Li, Jie Wang, Huanhuan Gong, Guozhen Sun, Zhipeng Bao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lihua ZhouDepartment of Cardiology, Jiangsu Provincial People's Hospital (The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University), Nanjing, 210029, China.
Yafan ZhaoDepartment of Cardiology, Jiangsu Provincial People's Hospital (The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University), Nanjing, 210029, China.
Wen SongDepartment of Cardiology, Jiangsu Provincial People's Hospital (The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University), Nanjing, 210029, China.
Yunxia LiSchool of Nursing, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 211166, China.
Jie WangDepartment of Cardiology, Jiangsu Provincial People's Hospital (The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University), Nanjing, 210029, China.
Huanhuan GongDepartment of Cardiology, Jiangsu Provincial People's Hospital (The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University), Nanjing, 210029, China.
Guozhen SunDepartment of Cardiology, Jiangsu Provincial People's Hospital (The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University), Nanjing, 210029, China.
Zhipeng BaoDepartment of Cardiology, Jiangsu Provincial People's Hospital (The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University), Nanjing, 210029, China. baozhipeng1219@163.com.

Funding

Institute for Hospital Reform and Development of Nanjing University NDYG052Jiangsu Youth Science and Technology Talent Promotion Project JSTJ-2025-386National Natural Science Foundation of China No. 72074124Youth Foundation Cultivation Program of the National Natural Science Foundation at Jiangsu Provincial People's Hospital PY2022002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiac tamponade is a rare yet catastrophic complication during atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation. Influenced by multiple procedural and patient-related factors, its prediction remains highly challenging. This study aimed to develop and interpret a machine learning-based predictive model for cardiac tamponade during AF catheter ablation. Data were retrospectively collected from 1481 patients who underwent AF catheter ablation at a tertiary hospital in Nanjing, China, between October 2014 and December 2024. After identifying key predictors of intraoperative cardiac tamponade via least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression, eight machine learning algorithms were trained using Python libraries. Model performance was evaluated through cross-validation, and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis was performed to interpret the best-performing model. The XGBoost model exhibited the optimal overall performance, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.972 in the training set and 0.908 in internal validation, demonstrating excellent calibration and the highest clinical net benefit. SHAP analysis identified five major predictors: operator experience, D-dimer level, total heparin dose, AF type, and left atrial diameter. These predictors represent multidimensional determinants associated with procedural technique, coagulation status, and cardiac anatomy. The XGBoost-based predictive model showed strong discriminative ability and interpretability for predicting cardiac tamponade during AF catheter ablation, which supports accurate preoperative risk stratification and guides intraoperative management to enhance procedural safety and precision. External validation across multiple centers is required to confirm the generalizability of the model.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationCardiac TamponadeCatheter AblationMachine LearningBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsAtrial fibrillation ablationCardiac tamponadeMachine learningRisk factorsRisk prediction

Identifiers

PMID41703170
PMCPMC13004880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.