ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2026
Using scene proximity judgments to study food-specific recognition ability.
Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The visual recognition of food depends on both domain-general and domain-specific visual mechanisms. Food-recognition ability negatively correlates with food neophobia (the tendency to avoid novel foods), possibly because the avoidance of novel food may limit perceptual experience that supports food recognition abilities. In prior work this relationship remained when domain-general object shape recognition ability (o) was controlled for, suggesting that this relationship is specific to food recognition. However, it is possible that other general recognition abilities, such as those for color and texture information, could also play a role. To test this, we developed outdoor scene-recognition tests. Like images of prepared food, outdoor scenes are rich in color and texture information. In 204 participants, we replicated previous findings that food-recognition tasks remain correlated after controlling for o. We additionally found that these correlations remain when scene-recognition ability is controlled for, strengthening evidence for a food-specific visual ability. The negative relationship between food-recognition ability and food neophobia also persisted after controlling for both o and scene-recognition ability, supporting the idea that this relationship reflects food-specific processes. These results indicate that food-specific processing goes beyond general visual abilities that apply to shape, color, and texture. The relationship with food neophobia supports a connection between perceptual expertise for food and affective responses to food that could inform interventions for individuals with restricted eating patterns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.