Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41703129›Full record

ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2026

Refreshing boosts memory but does not protect it against interference.

Caro Hautekiet, Evie Vergauwe, Alessandra S Souza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Caro HautekietFaculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland. c.h.hautekiet@vu.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4797-4510
Evie VergauweFaculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7339-2370
Alessandra S SouzaCenter for Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1057-8426

Funding

COMPUTER AIDED ANALYSIS OF ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHYZ01CT000002 · CIT · COMPUTER RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY · PI BAILEY, JAMES J. · 1985 to 2003
–
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 CT000002Portugese National Science Foundation CEECINST/00159/2018/CP1511/CT0002Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 100014_192204Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung PCEFP1_181141
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Attention can be directed to representations maintained in working memory, increasing their accessibility for later retrieval. Previous studies have observed a cumulative benefit of focused attention: The more often an item is brought into the focus of attention, the better it is recalled. This can be explained by the notion that a memory representation is strengthened every time attention is focused on it, a process known as refreshing. The current study investigated whether refreshing goes together with increased robustness against interference. In two experiments, we examined whether an item's susceptibility to interference by an interruption task gradually decreases as an item is more frequently refreshed. Participants memorized six colors for a continuous reproduction test. During the retention interval, they were instructed to refresh some of these colors once, twice, or never, and then completed an interruption task in half of the trials. In Experiment 1, the interruption was a domain-non-overlapping auditory parity judgment task, whereas in Experiment 2, we used a domain-overlapping visual color judgment task. In both experiments, memory performance was hindered by the interruption but improved with increasing refreshing frequency. These two effects did not interact, indicating that the negative impact of the interruption was not reduced by refreshing. Thus, although refreshing an item improves retrieval from working memory, it does not provide greater protection against interference.

Indexed as

AttentionMemory, Short-TermMental RecallAdultColor PerceptionFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultAttentionFocus of attentionInterferenceRefreshingWorking memory

Identifiers

PMID41703129
PMCPMC13661716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.