Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41703057›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

An electrochemical hypothesis of earthquakes exploring a theoretical link between radiated seismic energy and Pourbaix potential.

Atanu Das, Sankar Prasad Bag

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Atanu DasManipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India. atanu.das@manipal.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1733-626X
Sankar Prasad BagSchool of Electronics and Communication Engineering, REVA University, Bangalore, 560064, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Earthquakes are measured using well-defined seismic parameters such as seismic moment ([Formula: see text]), moment magnitude ([Formula: see text]), and released elastic energy (E). However, the mechanism by which this tremendous energy accumulates deep within the Earth's crust remains unclear and is one of the most fundamental open questions in seismological research. We investigate a quantitative link between earthquake radiated energy and the generalized Pourbaix electrochemical potential. This analysis forms the basis of a theoretical electrochemical framework for assessing whether electrical processes may contribute to earthquake nucleation. An intriguing similarity has been found between the released energy in an earthquake and Pourbaix potential in a redox reaction at an oxide-aqueous interface. A mathematical equivalence is established to strengthen this connection. This provides new insights into the possible electrochemical mechanism underlying seismic processes. Hydrated smectite, a clay mineral with a distinctive layered structure, is a dominant source of electrochemical potential generation in the Earth's crust. Observations of significant smectite abundance in various deep drilling projects indirectly support this assertion. The layered arrangement of these hydrated clay minerals enables the formation of multiple electrochemical cells, leading to substantial accumulation of electrochemical potential. This observation indicates the presence of electrical potential in the earthquake preparation zone, which may offer a more comprehensive explanation for earthquake lights, negative anomalies in atmospheric electric fields, ionospheric perturbations, and other associated phenomena observed before or during an earthquake.

Identifiers

PMID41703057
PMCPMC12979594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.