ArticleScientific reports2026
Anti interference and fault tolerant control of UAVs integrating residual based diagnosis disturbance estimation with counter drone strategies.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) are increasingly deployed in complex, uncertain, and adversarial environments, yet they remain vulnerable to actuator faults, environmental disturbances, and deliberate interferences such as jamming or spoofing. Conventional control approaches typically address these challenges independently, focusing on either fault-tolerant control (FTC), disturbance rejection, or counter-UAV defense. This paper presents an integrated anti-interference and fault-tolerant control framework that unifies three complementary modules: (i) residual-based fault detection and isolation, (ii) adaptive extended state observer (AESO)-based disturbance estimation and compensation, and (iii) counter-UAV evasive maneuver strategies. The framework is formulated using a nonlinear UAV dynamic model and rigorously analyzed under Lyapunov stability theory. Simulation results demonstrate significant performance improvements compared with baseline controllers. The proposed method reduced position and attitude deviations to below 0.05 m and 0.03 deg, respectively, under simultaneous actuator faults and wind disturbances. Fault and disturbance estimation errors remained below 0.05 and 0.03 units, respectively, ensuring timely control reconfiguration. Furthermore, the UAV achieved a 100% success rate in counter-drone evasive maneuvers while maintaining trajectory stability. These results confirm that the integrated design provides high resilience, rapid recovery, and reliable performance in fault-disturbed and adversarial conditions. By bridging FTC, adaptive disturbance rejection, and counter-UAV defense, the proposed framework advances the state of the art in resilient UAV control for civilian and defense applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.