Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41703044›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Explainable AI in education: integrating educational domain knowledge into the deep learning model for improved student performance prediction.

Ming Qiang, Ziyang Liu, Ru Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ming QiangCentre of International Education, Fuzhou Polytechnic, Fuzhou, 350108, Fujian, China.
Ziyang LiuAsia-Pacific AI Research Center, Asian Business Research Institute, Hongkong, 999077, China.
Ru ZhangDepartment of Design, Hanyang University, Seoul, 04763, Korea. zhangru@hanyang.ac.kr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although deep learning models, especially the Artificial Neural Network (ANN), are widely used for student performance prediction, their "black-box" nature often leads to unreliable learned relationships that contradict educational domain knowledge, limiting both trustworthiness and further performance improvement. Based on Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP), this study developed an ANN using a public dataset containing 395 Portuguese high school students' mathematics performance records. The analysis identified key features influencing students' mathematics performance and revealed that the original correlations learned by the ANN were inconsistent with established educational domain knowledge. To address this issue, we proposed the Student Performance Prediction Explanation (SPPE) algorithm for optimizing ANN, which reassessed the contribution of 30 features under the guidance of educational domain knowledge. Both global and local interpretability analyses were conducted to examine the process of importance changes. Furthermore, this study found that after aligning the model with educational domain knowledge, the prediction accuracy of the proposed ANN achieved a 26.9% improvement compared with the original model. In addition, it outperformed some typical traditional machine learning algorithms. Additional experiments further confirmed that the proposed SPPE strategy is applicable to various ANN architectures, supporting its robustness across model structures within this dataset and reinforcing its generalizability and practical value. The findings of this study demonstrated that integrating educational domain knowledge can improve student performance prediction, contributing to the development of interpretable neural network frameworks and offering actionable insights for other educational applications.

Indexed as

Deep learningEducational domain knowledgeEducational technologyExplainable AISHAPStudent performance prediction

Identifiers

PMID41703044
PMCPMC13004980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.