ArticleScientific reports2026
Elective thoracic oncologic resections in selected patients appear safe beyond four weeks after COVID-19 infection.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The global spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has had a profound public health impact, particularly on perioperative management, rendering the optimization of timing for post-infection thoracic oncologic surgery a pressing clinical concern. This multicenter retrospective cohort study included adult patients who underwent elective video-assisted thoracic oncologic surgery in February 2023 with confirmed COVID-19 infection ≥ 4 weeks prior. A matched historical control cohort from February 2019 was used for comparison. Propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were applied to adjust for confounders. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on clinical variables, and logistic regression was used to assess the association between infection-to-surgery interval and PPCs. A total of 846 patients were included. After PSM and IPTW, the incidence of PPCs remained comparable between the COVID-19 and no-COVID-19 groups (PSM: 26.1% vs. 31.8%, p = 0.784; IPTW: 28.0% vs. 29.7%, p = 0.615). No significant differences in PPC rates were observed across infection-to-surgery intervals (4–6, 6–8, and 8–12 weeks; p = 0.953). Prior COVID-19 infection was associated with higher postoperative WBC counts and lower lymphocyte levels, but not with increased PPCs risk. Smoking history was an independent predictor of PPCs (OR: 2.503, p = 0.005), while infection timing was not. Thoracic oncologic surgery may be considered ≥ 4 weeks after COVID-19 recovery in carefully selected patients. Further prospective studies are needed to assess safety in earlier postoperative intervals and among patients recovering from severe infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.