ArticleScientific reports2026
Chemical and structural analysis of a European hornet nest.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates the chemical and structural composition of a Vespa crabro nest before museum consolidation. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), X-ray fluorescence (XRF), computed tomography (CT), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and fiber analysis were used to assess its material properties and biochemical wood decomposition processes. HPLC results indicate the nest consists primarily of polysaccharides (≈ 52 wt%), including partially hydrolyzed cellulose and hemicelluloses, with degradation products present in extractive fractions. Lignin content (≈ 17.6 wt%) is lower than in native wood, likely due to the use of weathered or decayed material for easier processing during nest construction. Sugar analysis and SEM confirm hardwood as the primary source material. FT-IR analysis reveals that darker brown areas contain higher lignin content and cellulose with lower crystallinity than beige areas. FTIR and optical microscopy also identify proteins in the outer shell (as a natural adhesive) and inside comb cells (as larval waste). XRF detected trace elements (≈ 1.4 wt%) such as Fe, Pb, Sn, Sb from environmental sources. CT scanning revealed a 10-layered hexagonal comb structure, optimized for strength and insulation. These findings provide new insights into Vespa crabro nest construction, emphasizing the role of hornets in natural wood decomposition and motivating novel approaches to sustainable fiber-based materials, adhesives, and insulation technologies. The results contribute to material science, wood processing, entomology, and bio-based composites conservation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.