ArticleScientific reports2026
Behavioral and neural aftermath of right inferior frontal cortex disruption on ambiguous vocal emotion decisional processes.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The evaluation of socio-affective auditory information is accomplished by the primary auditory cortex in collaboration with limbic regions and the inferior frontal cortex (IFC)—the latter often recruited during affective voice classification. IFC activity was observed either for coding sensory or perceptual ambiguity or representing more exclusively categorical processes such as object and affect information. Here, we presented ‘clear’ (or ‘pure’) and emotionally ‘ambiguous’ affective speech to two groups of human participants and asked them to explicitly categorize these voices’ emotion. During the task, wholebrain functional magnetic resonance imaging was acquired and combined with transcranial magnetic stimulation, specifically continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS; target site: right IFC pars triangularis) between the first and subsequent task runs. Contrary to our hypotheses, offline right IFC disruption through cTBS did not reveal improved accuracy to classify ‘ambiguous’ voices, and instead led to reduced auditory cortical activity and increased fronto-limbic connectivity for ‘clear’ affective speech. Although the expected impact of right IFC cTBS on behavioral performance did not occur, our imaging data still indicate activity patterns modified by the cTBS procedure. This was especially true in the right anterior superior temporal lobe, parietal cortex and superior frontal cortex. Due to the absence of conclusive behavioral results, we discuss our data and study limitations to hopefully allow for clearer design and methods for future work on the important topic of psychological and neural processes underlying vocal emotion decisional processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.