Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41702961›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Interpretable machine learning-based real-time sepsis diagnosis.

Fahim Mahmud, Muhammad Quamruzzaman, Abdurrashid Ibrahim Sanka, Ray C C Cheung, Mehdi Hasan Chowdhury

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fahim MahmudDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Chittagong University of Engineering and Technology, Chittagong, Bangladesh.
Muhammad QuamruzzamanDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Chittagong University of Engineering and Technology, Chittagong, Bangladesh.
Abdurrashid Ibrahim SankaDepartment of Electrical Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Ray C C CheungDepartment of Electrical Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Mehdi Hasan ChowdhuryDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Chittagong University of Engineering and Technology, Chittagong, Bangladesh. mhchowdhury@cuet.ac.bd.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sepsis is among the top global health issues, leading to serious health risks with high mortality and morbidity. Recent statistics revealed around 50 million Sepsis cases and 11 million deaths annually. Sepsis arises due to the body’s abnormal response to an infection, leading to severe health conditions such as organ failure. As such, failure to detect Sepsis timely may be fatal. However, early detection of Sepsis onset remains a great challenge. This paper leverages lightweight models and develops an efficient approach and system for accurate, easily affordable, and early diagnosis of Sepsis. The diagnosis uses seven non-invasive vital signs, namely, heart rate, body temperature, systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial blood pressure, oxygen saturation level, and end-tidal carbon dioxide. The proposed system will improve public health and relieve the burden on the ICU by preventing severe Sepsis cases. Our proposed system could also be implemented using low-cost sensors and interfaces, making the system suitable for remote monitoring with the Internet of Things (IoT). Furthermore, a novel method is adopted for handling class imbalance in the dataset. Additionally, Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) and Locally Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME) were leveraged to gain insight into the system. The system was implemented and evaluated using our evaluation platform consisting of basic sensors and a Raspberry Pi as a point-of-care Sepsis detection tool proof of concept. Our model obtained a utility score of around 46% (set by the Physionet challenge, the database source). The model also achieved better performances of 86.49% accuracy and an AUROC of 0.94 compared to the related Sepsis detection works.

Indexed as

Machine LearningSepsisEarly DiagnosisHumansVital SignsGradient boosting modelLocally Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME)National Early Warning System (NEWS)Non-Overlapping Subset Ensemble (NOSE)quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA)SepsisShapley Additive Explanations (SHAP)Vital signs

Identifiers

PMID41702961
PMCPMC12914022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.