ArticleScientific reports2026
Neurobehavioral outcomes at 12 months in very preterm infants monitored with continuous glucose monitoring at birth compared with full-term infants.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Very preterm (VPT, ≤ 32 weeks gestational age) newborns often experience neurodevelopmental delays or impairments. Early detection of these difficulties may improve long-term outcomes. Standardized clinical scales may fail to identify subtle cognitive disturbances, whereas lab-based tasks can provide greater sensitivity. In addition, VPT infants typically show greater glycaemic variability at birth than full-term (FT) infants, which may affect neurodevelopment, although previous findings are inconsistent.This study investigated whether lab-based tasks assessing visual attention and visual short-term memory, alongside standardized developmental scales, could provide a more detailed understanding of cognitive development in VPT compared with FT infants. Furthermore, by continuously measuring glucose levels during the first postnatal week using a continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) device, the study examined how neonatal glucose variability relates to neurodevelopmental outcomes at 12 months corrected age (CA). Sixty VPT infants were enrolled, and 43 completed the 12-month follow-up; 31 FT infants served as controls. VPT infants performed worse than FT infants across cognitive, motor, and language domains, and group differences also emerged in the computerized tasks. Notably, tighter glycaemic control at birth was associated with memory performance at 12 months CA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.