Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41702946›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2026

Effectiveness and safety of cyclosporine A in moderate to severe COVID-19: a randomized, open-label trial.

Amira A Zidan, Ahmed Y S Gad, Nermine H Zakaria, Hazem M El-Hariri, Noha M Elsharnouby, Maged W Helmy, Maged El-Setouhy

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase III
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Amira A ZidanDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, El-Beheira Health Affairs, Ministry of Health, Damanhour, Egypt. amira.zidan2yahoo@gmail.com.
Ahmed Y S GadDepartment of Chest Disease, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt. AHMED.JAD@alexmed.edu.eg.
Nermine H ZakariaDepartment of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
Hazem M El-HaririDepartment of Community Medicine, National Research Centre, Cairo, Egypt.
Noha M ElsharnoubyDepartment of Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Management, Faculty of Medicine, Ain-Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Maged W HelmyDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Damanhour University, Damanhour, Egypt.
Maged El-SetouhyDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Jazan University, Jazan, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. ma.elsetouhy@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

COVID-19 severity is strongly associated with hyperinflammation. Cyclosporine A (CSA), an interleukin-2 inhibitor with immunomodulatory and antiviral activity, has been proposed as a potential adjunctive therapy. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of CSA in patients with moderate to severe COVID-19. We conducted A randomized, open-label phase III trial was conducted involving 66 patients with COVID-19. Participants were assigned to one of two groups: the CSA group (n = 23), receiving 6 mg/kg/day for 7-14 days, and a standard treatment group (n = 43). Clinical improvement (WHO ordinal scale) was the main goal, with C-reactive protein (CRP), ferritin, interleukin-6 ( IL-6), and D-dimer, and safety monitoring for 28 days as secondary outcomes significant differences in enrolment. The time to clinical improvement was significantly shorter in the CSA group (4.3 ± 1.0 vs. 5.1 ± 2.3 days; p = 0.025). Oxygen supplementation was used in 7 patients (30.43%) versus 12 patients (27.91%) in the standard group, with a p-value of 0.828. No significant differences occurred in the WHO ordinal scale, advanced respiratory support, or mortality. No secondary infections occurred. CSA improved oxygen saturation and reduced CRP and IL-6; differences in saturation at day 14 were not significant. D-dimer and ferritin levels were lower at day 14, with no differences observed at day 7. Cyclosporine did not significantly improve ordinal scale outcomes. However, it was associated with a shorter time to clinical improvement and favorable modulation of inflammatory markers in patients with COVID-19 and cytokine storm, without major safety concerns.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 Drug TreatmentCyclosporineImmunosuppressive AgentsAgedC-Reactive ProteinFemaleFerritinsFibrin Fibrinogen Degradation ProductsHumansInterleukin-6MaleMiddle AgedSARS-CoV-2Severity of Illness IndexTreatment OutcomeC-Reactive ProteinCyclosporineFerritinsFibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Productsfibrin fragment DImmunosuppressive AgentsInterleukin-6Covid-19C-reactive protein (CRP)CyclosporineD-dimerFerritinHyperinflammationHyperinflammatory markersInterleukin-2 (IL-2)Interleukin-6 (IL-6)Standard treatment

Identifiers

PMID41702946
PMCPMC12913897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.