Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41702941›Full record

ArticleNPJ science of learning2026

Knowledge reshapes inquiry by changing question asking ability and impacting academic assessment.

Tuval Raz, Yoed N Kenett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ science of learning, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tuval RazFaculty of Data and Decision Sciences, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel. tuval.raz@campus.technion.ac.il.
Yoed N KenettFaculty of Data and Decision Sciences, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Question-asking is central to human communication, cognitive development, and learning. While prior research has examined questioning in controlled, non-longitudinal settings, little is known about how the originality and complexity of the questions people ask change over time or how these abilities respond to knowledge acquisition. This study examined how gained knowledge shapes question-asking and whether these abilities predict academic outcomes. Undergraduate students (N = 68) enrolled in a semester-long "Intro to Psychology" course completed general and domain-specific question-asking tasks at the start and end of the semester, along with an open-ended final project and a closed-ended multiple-choice exam. Domain-specific question-asking improved over time, whereas general question-asking remained stable or declined. General and specific question-asking abilities were negatively related to closed-ended test performance and positively related to open-ended project performance. These findings clarify how knowledge reshapes inquiry and highlight the educational value of fostering stronger question-asking skills.

Identifiers

PMID41702941
PMCPMC13031957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.