ArticleNPJ breast cancer2026
Phase II trial of anlotinib-chemotherapy combination in pretreated HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: therapeutic efficacy and proteomic biomarker profiling.
Article in NPJ breast cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The management of HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in the second-line or later setting remains challenging, due to the absence of standardized regimens and the limited efficacy of chemotherapy. Here, we report a prospectively, single-arm, phase II study evaluating anlotinib plus chemotherapy in patients with HER2-negative MBC (n = 33) who had progressed after at least one prior line of systemic therapy for metastatic disease. The primary endpoints were median progression-free survival (mPFS) and overall survival (OS), while secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety. Exploratory proteomic profiling using the Olink Target 96 Immuno-Oncology panel was performed on baseline serum samples to identify potential predictors of response. After a median follow-up of 25.9 months and the median number of prior systemic therapy lines was 2 (range, 1-4). The mPFS was 8.3 (95% CI: 6.3-10.3) months, and the mOS was 22.2(95% CI: 13.1-31.3) months. The ORR was 33.3%, DCR reached 90.9% and CBR stood at 60.6%. Proteomic analysis indicated that higher baseline serum levels of proteins including CSF-1 were associated with shorter PFS (P < 0.05). No treatment-related fatalities were observed. This trial is registered with www.chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR2400081835) on 13 March 2024.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.